Environmental Science And Policy

Running head : environsal cognition and insurancesurroundal Science and insuranceName of StudentName of College /UniversityName of ProfessorCourse milieual Science and PolicyIntroductionThe concomitant of rapid scotch and political changes could be traced from the post-era of indus run renewal . These changes energize brought sham to the surroundings wherein emerging industrial pass along and remarkable growth of community has acquired signifi flowerpott economic resourcing relating to the work of the ecosystem . On the different baseball glove , the ac attach toing trends in the ema commonwealth of scientific discipline and technologies befool conquered the allowiality of natural sciencesThe elaboration of circumstanceories , teaching of industrial machineries and change magnitude notions of vehicles has brough t in the looming stay of course defilement and other(a) pollutants . Likewise , the exploitative and un high-octane consumption of environment depletes the natural habitation of flora and savage , from which the ecosystem fails fragile and the forces of Mother Nature asymmetrically collideToday , Global heat is a potential catastrophe that threatens the earth and all its inhabitants . much(prenominal) a patch depicts the verse of the Founder of Evolutionary political economy , Kenneth E wart Boulding s (1910-1993 as advancedThe ground is finite , re beginnings ar scarce , Things argon bad and forget be worse , Coal is burned- bulge(a) and gas exploded , Forests out and soil eroded s s healthful up ar dry and striving polluted , Dust is blowing , trees atomic number 18 uprooted , Oil is going , ores depleted , Drains receive what is excreted , bring down is drop down , seas atomic number 18 rising , Man is uttermost too industrious , Fires will rage with man to buff it , Soon we will have a plund! ered artificial satellite (Boulding ,1993 in Edugreen Poems , 2008The wellness hazard and death toll connectd to job befoulment is passing alarming limitedally in most extremely populated and highly industrialized countries . thus , the do it on melody defilement is have a go at itd as a sarcastic sociological , economic and geological problem that is tried to be sensibly handleed by pile and presidency activitys orbitwideThis will objectively catch the purpose and scope of various authoritiesal and non-governmental responses on environmental science and indemnity issues relating to the growth of the unite States blood little childs wager stage , and the writ of executions or carry ons of its posterior reformments towards achieving depicted object and international importance in enacting policies to mitigate air taint and towards the resistance and deliverance of the global environmentMethodologyThis adopts a three-prong method of get , su ch(prenominal) as (1 ) a re horizon of literature relating to the garish line of business proceeding (2 ) discussion of policy issues modify its detonating device punishment , and (3 ) situational summary to evaluate the subject sphere impactWhat is beak channelize actuate tally to the linked States environmental trade protection chest of drawers (US-EPA , the clear(p) pipeline number (CAA ) has been amend in 1970 as an ambitious issue oppose to go steady healthy and lumber air by imperative air taintWith the 1970 amendment to CAA , some US- imbrutedd industries criticized the CAA s carrying out out-of-pocket expensive contour . To look up , the American businesses in a number of slip commission are forced to sway air contaminant by end-of-pipe methods that confine pollution and implement preventative measures that limit the pith of pollutants , in which the hail of entry with slap-up bare do commandments can be expensive (US-EPA , 20 08However , the mediocre mental strain swerve has! been enacted to basically cut back air pollution . found on the report of Business Week Magazine (2008 , CAA jacket crown punishment contributes to the accrue of significant amounts of air pollutants in the US at nigh 30 from the period of 1970 to 1995 , in go against of the US population growth of 28 of that periodLiterature retreadBrief historic backgroundThe problems on air pollution have long been an issue way back from the period of King Edward I of England in 1306 (American meteorologic guild , 1999 . As further denotationd from the American Meteorological beau monde (1999 , King Edward issued a proclamation banning the expend of sea coal in London due to the smoke it ca utilize . On the succeeding centuries large Britain continuously move the anti-pollution reason on its first trial to air pollution entertainling in Chicago and Cincinnati during its US occupation , in which it legislated the percipient send off Policy of 1881After the British-American w ar , the scour strain Policy of 1881 was adopted by the US and enforced by its national government agencies , limitedally the authority of Mines of the De pop outment of the Interior which found the Office of appearance befoulment . In the 1940 s , the tragedy caused by a deadly smogginess in Los Angeles and Donora , Pennsylvania lordly the alarm of the residents of affected areas which called the US relative to pass the `Air contaminant look into proceed of 1955 , which was the first white air and air flavor control acts that is excuse in core and macrocosm continuously rewrite and amend (American Meteorological Society 1999Historical amendments to the groovy Air be active as a disk operating system policyA timeline on the amendments to the bonny Air crook is herein characterd from the electronic journal of the American Meteorological Society (1999 ) in to widey discuss the historical and chronological basis of its organic evolution as a state polic y , as followsIn 1955 , the local governments probl! ems on air pollution has triggered the federal government to address the issue at a national level in which coitus passed the Air pollution Control map of 1955 as a contribute of the deadly smog tragedy in Donora , Pennsylvania that accounted the deaths of 20 plenty and hundreds of casualties from airborne diseasesIn 1963 , Congress passed the nation s lily-white Air issue of 1963 to reduce air pollution by view sacking standards for nonmoving man-made lakes such as power plants and steel mills . It did not start out into account mobile reference points of air pollution which had do the largest starting time of m either dangerous pollutantsIn 1970 , the issue on curt laws in enacting the Clean Air operation of 1963 has been revise by the Clean Air turn of events of 1970 as a study modification which emphasized challenging principles , such as the government of primary and biteary principles for climb air quality , pick at emissions from meansies and veh icles as to be enacted by the state and federal government , and incrementd funds for air pollution examination and increment . Congress did not amend the Clean Air morsel during the 1980 s because of president Reagan s prioritization of economic policies to a higher step to the fore environmental follow upsIn 1990 , the long strain of idleness of the federal government has realized the need to measure up the Clean Air telephone number of 1970 . The amendment has enacted the taint levelheaded profession run of 1990 that focuses on 5 make areas of carrying out , such as (1 ) air-quality standards (2 ) force vehicle emissions and alternative fuels (3 ) toxic air pollutants (4 ) lethal rain , and (5 ) stratospheric ozone depletion . The defilement stripe make for of 1990 (as revise ) go for a recovery of gaps of regulative policies and sceptered the routines of government agencies and the slayings of their policiesEnactment of the pollution Prevention proc ess of 1990How has the diddle [as amended] balanced ! the regional tint of air quality issues with the national importance of air pollution as a whole This caput could be well described by the implementation of the defilement Prevention figure out of 1990 (PPA90 . The US environmental Protection billet (US-EPA ) was economyd to spearhead the implementation of PPA90 . The affaire of the US-EPA and its decision venturer has been outlined in the PPA90 preparation as amended on December 31st 2002 (PL 107-377 , to cite , the Administrator [and the commission ] shall bring forth and implement a scheme to go on showtime step-down (Sec 6604-a ,.180 in US Senate , 2002Under the succeeding nourishment , the key strategies of US-EPA were identified , cited as follows (1 ) progress standard methods of measure of informant simplification (2 ) ensure that the assurance considers the solvent of its real and proposed broadcasts on lineage reduction drivings and retread regulations prior and subsequent to determine their ef fect on stemma reduction (3 ) array blood reduction activities to grow consultation reduction practices in other federal official agencies , develop generic research and discipline on techniques and processes which have wide-eyed applicability (4 ) develop alter methods of coordinating waterwaylining and assuring fundament access to tuition amass under national environmental statutes (5 ) facilitate the adoption of citation reduction techniques by businesses with permute of study on capabilities (6 ) signalise measurable goals (8 ) contribute an informatory panel of skillful experts comprised of representatives from effort the States , and public interest groups to cleanse collection and public exposure of entropy (9 ) establish a training program on kickoff reduction opportunities (10 ) identify and recommend to Congress to appropriate barriers to line reduction including the use of inducements and disincentives (11 ) identify opportunities to use federal procurement to encourage reference book redu! ction (12 ) develop , exam and disseminate model source reduction , and auditing cognitive operations to sidle up source reduction opportunities and (13 ) establish an annual award program to recognize a company or companies which operate outstanding or innovative source reduction programs (Sec . 6604-b , 1-13 ,.180-181 in US Senate , 2002Policy Issues affecting US-EPA ImplementationThe key strategical component programsIn relation to the principle of PPA90 , we whitethorn ask a question what has been the net effect of the PPA90 ? The logical implication of this question whitethorn point out to policy issues affecting the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA ) program implementation . The inquiry could be directed to discussing the incumbent activities or undertakings of the US-EPA through its key strategic component programs . One of the effects of enacting the PPA90 was the act of executive director 13423 on January 24th 2007 . To cite , the EO 13423 was punish by President George W . Bush to strengthen federal environmental , nil and conveyance of titleation management (Federal Register , 2007Under the EO 13423 is the policy that empowers the US-EPA in implementing the take aim of environmental , imparting , and efficacy-related activities under the law in take for of their respective missions in an environmentally , economically and fiscally good for you(p) integrated , continuously improving , efficient , and sustainable modal value (Sec .1 , EO 13423 in Federal Register , 2007 . In which the writ of execution or implementation of this provision also refer to the function of a Presidential appointee or designated Federal Environmental Executive that will waterwayline and ensure efficient and in force(p) implementation of the US-EPA s program . As cited from the provision , the Office of the Federal Environmental Executive shall maintain the Environmental Protection Agency for funding and administrative purposes ( Sec .6 : a-c EO 13423 in Federal Register , 2007In ef! fect of the EO 13423 , the US-EPA spearheads in implementing one of its key strategic programs on environmentally Preferable Purchasing (EPP , in which , to cite , committed to reduction environmental footprints or traces of waste textiles by (1 ) increasing and promoting reprocess reducing materials entering the Federal Agency s waste stream (2 Promoting and achieving addd and preferential use of materials with recycled content and (3 ) Emphasizing and increasing the grease ones palms and use of environmentally preferable products (US-EPA , 2007To cite , the rule of US-EPA-EPP program is found on its impact assessment on the federal purchasing , macrocosm the single largest consumer of unspoilts and services at affection the United States that has spending estimated at 350 billion for goods and services . neverthe slight , as cited , US-EPA assemble that purchasing power exerts a atrocious influence on products and services in the national grocery , of which the EPP program seek to ensure that federal government s obtain power is working to the greatest extent possible to annex availability of environmentally preferable products that shall minimize impact to the environment (US-EPA , 2007By judicious implementation of the EPP program , the US-EPA envisions the benefits it would bring to the American citizenry and a global contribution to reducing environmental risks . To cite , these benefits shall (1 ) Im essayd ability to meet environmental goals (2 ) Improved doer safety and health (3 ) Reduced liabilities (4 ) Reduced health and purpose costs (5 ) Increased availability of environmentally preferable products in the marketplace (US-EPA , 2007With regard to addressing other issues particularly on environmental science , we whitethorn cite the initiative of the US Congress in establishing the Science Advisory Board (SAB ) in1978 as an incorporating molding of US-EPA , in which SAB has extensive mandate to complement US-EPA s tech nological undertakings as follows (1 ) reviewing the ! quality and relevance of the scientific and skilful information macrocosm used or proposed as the basis for regulations (2 ) reviewing research programs and the skillful basis of applied programs (3 ) reviewing generic approaches to regulative science that includes guidelines on the use of scientific and expert information in regulatory decisions and evaluating analytic methods of mathematical modeling (4 ) advising on expansive scientific determinations on science , technology , social and economic issues , and (5 ) advising the on emergency and other short-notice programs (US-EPA , 2007In sum , the US-EPA whitethorn be considered as a multi-dimensional regulatory agency patterned to the evolution of the Clean Air execute that gave birth to the Pollution Prevention exploit of 1990 . A picture review of US-EPA programs reveal its multipurpose and multifunctional procedure in environmental management , in which the subsequent amendments to the Clean Air go from 1955 to 1 970 traces the patterns of envisioning and creating an environmental manning agency combining weight to US-EPA . From this observation , it could be of best interest to further prove the magnitude of effects or impact of US-EPA as an executor of environmental science and policySituational Analysis Evaluating National ImpactThis section of the will consider the effectiveness and cognitive process of US-EPA program through discussions of pertinent findings , to sterilize the abridgment in evaluating the national impactTo analyze the situational factor of establishing US-EPA , we whitethorn again sum-up the evolution of Clean Air Act in retrospect on the mandate of EPA . base on the historical process of amending the CAA , we may cite that environmental law and policy on air pollution control and preservation of good quality air was central to end-of-pipe method and control condition and control regulation [wherein environmental protection is perceived in fit of prevent ing pollution from the source] , in which the percept! ion has shifted through the Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 that emanated EPA s mandate in Pollution barroom that has doubled management approach in both defend the environment and strengthening economic growth through much efficient manufacturing and raw material use (Pacific Environmental work Inc 1993In view of US-EPA s program , ingredient 6605 of the PPA90 provides the technical capability to evolve a national implementing guideline that envisions a national impact . To cite , Section 6605 states : to provide matching grants to States for programs designed to promote source reduction by businesses as to (1 ) make particular proposition technical assistance available to businesses seeking information around source reduction opportunities and funding for experts to assist in the development of source reduction plans (2 ) targeting assistance to businesses for whom lack of information is an stoppage to source reduction (3 ) provide training in source reduction techniqu es through local engineering schools or any other appropriate means (Sec .6605 : PPA90 as amended , PL 107-377 in US Senate , 2002In addition to envisioning a national impact through US-EPA s programs Section 6606 of PPA90 defines the installation of source reduction clearinghouse . As cited from the provision , to establish a computerized clearinghouse to be used as a tool for outreach , education and technical information to (1 ) cache and make available information including a computer data base which contains information on management technical , and actal approaches to source reduction and (2 ) make available to the public the pertinent information and analysis regarding source reduction (Sec .6606 : PPA90 as amended , PL 107-377 in US Senate , 2002It appears that based on the mandate of US-EPA , it realizes and implements the conceptual modeling of PPA90 in environmental protection and likewise being empowered by the enactment of Executive 13423 [as previously discussed in this ] , wherein the specific provisions clearly g! uides US-EPA to institutionalize its programs with an added service-incentives to American industries through technical grantsWe can deduced that the enactment of PPA90 has passed through an evolutionary economic compass of which we may perceived that the subsequent amendment to the Clean Air Act from 1955 to 1970 has not fully institutionalize the framework of operation in the policy guidelines . Although it was from the time of President Nixon in the early 70 s that attempted to install a bureaucratic agency where EPA may have been partly patterned , the national impact of the Nixon anti-pollution programs were less in magnitude in aspects of enforcement and institutional implementation . then , the 1990 economic destinyting may have called for a seasonable and necessary implementation of PPA90 through the US-EPA due to the rapid growth of population and boom of industries implicative to the growing environmental hazards specifically the continuing demand to transportation and expansive production modalities of factories that are primarily contributing to air pollutionTo further situate the analysis at an objective national perspective , we may suck up related findings on the aspect of US-EPA performance in implementing its programs . jibe to the findings of Shulamit Kahn and Christopher R . Knittel of the burden for the Study of goose egg Markets (CESM ) in University of calcium , the Clean Air Act amendments of 1990 (presently k immediatelyn as PPA90 ) have not [in some consideration] affected the electrical get-up-and-go assiduity . As cited from the findings of Kahn and Knittel (2003 ) average electricity firms were not adversely affected by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 , objet dart coal- mine firms were particularly barely one of the 35 firms owning Phase 1 electricity generating plants had a statistically significant response to the evolution of the legislation and that this response was positive and fewer than half of 14 firms had minus coefficients while 9 of 11 coal firms had ! disconfirming responses (Kahn Knittel , 2003The findings of Kahn and Knittel (2003 ) pointed out on the impact of PPA90 through US-EPA implementation to power industrial interwoven . The sampling of the empirical study on positive and negative responses (efficient and coefficient ) found that the bases of both industries (electricity and coal mining ) were on cost of compliance .

On the other hand , it was also found that the cost of compliance to the PPA90 could be passed on to the consumers as part of the attention s adjustments to the added operating cost . Based on the finding , the impact of the PPA90 enactment to energy industry would create a superficial reaction regarding cos t compliance , where in fact the PPA90 has prevented the occurrence of acid rain by imposing stark(a) technical compliance procedures from the energy industry , specifically in coal mining and use of coal in electricity productionMoreover , the outcome emphasizes the significance of assessing the result of environmental regulation on the energy sector and its consumers considering that the coal mining industry is a substantial monetary resource and labor-intensive industry mate . In which case , a continuing legislative effort or policy initiatives may complement to comprise the issue on cost compliance . The findings of Khan and knittel (2003 ) pointed out that the national impact of PPA90 through US-EPA has somehow tweaked the core of energy industries that is now confronted with a critical challenge how to farther stretching the capital budgetA homogeneous study was undertaken by Curtis Moore of the northeasterly-Midwest Institute , preferably from Kahn s and Knittel s fin dings . The findings of Moore (2001 ) relate the impa! ct of PPA90 and US-EPA to transport and energy sector . Citing Moore s finding , he described the Clean Air Act amendment (referring to PPA90 ) encourages sit down because its requisites for polluting facilities are more stringent within urban areas than in non-urban areas (Moore , C , 2001 . As further cited , the US-EPA technical requisites can swot up pollutant removal efficiencies wherein clean facilities reduce emissions by 1 .5 tons of pollutant from workaday ton of pollutant increase that can be translated as an incentive to build new emission sources , development , and transportation projects beyond urban centers , in outlying areas where the air quality still meets federal standards (Moore , C , 2001The early findings of Moore indicates that the technical procedures and facilities being used by US-EPA can be an efficient tools in maintaining air quality standards from urban and non-urban communities . As a result of the campaign in maintaining air quality standa rds , Moore found some(prenominal) transport operators and polluting facilities transferring to various non-urban states in to avoid the US-EPA geographical expanding upon . The transfer of training has not however avoided the stringent implementation of US-EPA programs in many states wherein compliance to air quality standards have employed the maintaining role of tolerance to pollutants . To cite , Moore describes the Clean Air Act (as amended by PPA90 ) conforms to its provisions that provide an impetus and opportunity to elicit the quality of life by linking clean energy revival meeting and strengthening the regional plan (Moore , C 2001Likewise , Moore s statistical data in 2001 has accounted the reduction of sulphur dioxide emissions reflective of the Clean Air Act amendments from 1971 to 1990 enactment of Pollution Prevention Act , as follows the date standard : Pre-1971 no standard 1971-1977 1 .2 lbs /M /BTU heat input 1977-90 constituent reduction 1990-present p ercentage reduction equivalency : probably 0 .4 in th! e West soaring , 0 .7 in the eastbound coast . The findings of Moore further discloses the effective performance of US-EPA in implementing its program and alter to streamline and collaborate its operation with the local state governments in US West and East coastsAnother interesting discussion is on the legal aspect of US-EPA s mandate that has been recognized by the US Federal coquette power to a case in `FDA v . Brown Williamson tobacco Corp (529 US , one hundred twenty , 2000 in Heinzerling , 2007 . To cite , in 1999 , the International Center for technology Assessment (ICTA ) and parties petitioned US-EPA to set standards to new motor vehicles emitting 4 kinds of raging chemicals namely : carbon dioxide , methane , azotic oxide , and hydro fluorocarbons The petition affirmed that , due to effects on clime , motor vehicles emitting these chemicals points to the provision on air pollution which may reasonably be judge to endanger public health or welfare , as provided b y Section 202 (a (1 ) of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (Heinzerling , 2007The above mentioned petition of ICTA and parties ( mummy v US-EPA ) was brought about by US-EPA s discretionary annunciation or refusal to set standards on the so-called glasshouse gases emission of new motor vehicles . The haughty address then reviewed similar cases on and executed , which found `FDA v . Brown Williamson baccy Corp as precedent to the case . On the other hand , the derivatives of the Supreme court to the so-called discretionary promulgation were found in Section 202 (a (1 ) of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 being commonly cognise as Pollution Prevention Act of 1990According to Heinzerling (2007 , the Supreme apostrophize promulgated a vote of 5-4 in favor of mammy and petitioners . The Supreme Court acknowledged the corroboration of PPA90 provisions stating that : (1 the Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA or the agency ) is being trustworthy to regulate gr eenhouse gases from motor vehicles and (2 that EPA e! rred in refusing to regulate these emissions based on policy concerns not reflected in the Act ( Section 202 : a-1 in Heinzerling 2007A brief review of the case in ` mama v . EPA (Case No . 05-1120 in US Supreme Court , 2006 ) tells two perceptive understanding first the impact of the amendment to Clean Air Act that formulated the PPA90 has been sensibly recognized by the public and the legal practitioners This recognition to the PPA90 could be understood that the people are besides conscious and supportive in the enactment (as also indicative to the performance of subsequent amendments from the statistical data of Moore in 2001 , and second is the juridical acceptance of the Supreme Court cognizant to upholding the material enforcement of PPA90 as a law and a public policy . Thus , the magnitude of impact in amending the Clean Air Act that enacted the Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 and the creation of US-EPA as its implementing body have evolved to national perspectivesConclus ionIt may be reason out that the enactment of Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 has subsisted from its long perfect state as a public policy . It may have been a long bounce of the US government before realizing the imperative situation of amending the Clean Air Act of 1970 , from which the long overdue has resulted the state to derive their recyclable from billion-dollar consumptionThe US being the third largest commonwealth and a major consumer of world s imports may convert its economic twinkle or surplusage into potential wastes . This potential wastage could sip in to the bottom of the land or have the residue fritter to airspace that may be distributed to various parts of the world . Thus , the climate change may be contributed by highly create countries , as they are engaged in massive industrial diversification of economy that consequentially leaves proportion hazards to the environmentWe may impart into the conclusion that the US-EPA is the realization of an evolu tionary socio-economic setting of the US to control a! nd manage the continuing growth of pollutants as they expand and despoil their economy , and the looming effect of population to the environment . It is then we can conclude that the enactment of PPA90 is urgent and strongly needing indispensable action prior to realization of a great power country sitting on top of its waste in a desolate and dying planetReferencesAmerican Meteorological Society (1999 . ` score of the Clean Air Act Retrieved 26April 2008 from hypertext transfer protocol / entanglement .ametsoc .org /sloan /cleanair / ability .htmlBusiness Week (2008 . `Behind Bush s About-Face on Emissions . Retrieved 26 April2008 from http /www .businessweek .com /bwdaily /dnflash /content /apr2008 /db_2 74239 .htmEdugreen Poems (2008 . `Kenneth Ewart Boulding , 1910-1993 . Retrieved 26 April2008 from http /www .edugreen .teri .res .in /misc /poem /poem .htmFederal Register (2007 . `Executive 13423 . Vol .72 , No .17 br.3919-3923 . Retrieved26 April 2008 fromhttp /a257 .g .aka maitech .net /7 /257 /2422 /01jan /edocket .access .gpo .gov /2007 /pdf /07-374 .pdfHeinzerling , L (2007 . ` humour Change and the Clean Air Act University of SanFrancisco Law Review , Vol . 42 (2007 , Georgetown Public Law ResearchNo . 1008492 . Retrieved 26 April 2008 fromhttp /s .ssrn .com /sol3 /s .cfm ?abstract_id 1008492Kahn , S . and Knittel , C .R (2003 . `The Impact of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990on Electric Utilities and Coal Mines : Evidence from the transmit Market Center forthe Study of Energy Markets (CESM , University of California Energy InstituteRetrieved 26 April 2008 fromhttp /repositories .cdlib .org /ucei /csem /CSEMWP-118Moore , C (2001 . `Smart Growth and the Clean Air Act . Northeast and MidwestInstitute . Retrieved 26 April 2008 from http /www .nemw .org /SGCleanAir .pdfPacific Environmental Services Inc (1993 . `Pollution Prevention in Compliance andEnforcement . Retrieved 26 April 2008 fromhttp /www .epa .gov /oppt /ppic /pubs /ppicarchive .htmUS Environmental Protection Agency (2007 . `The Clean A! ir Act as amended in 1990Retrieved 26 April 2008 from http /www .epa .gov /air /caa /index .htmlUS Senate (2002 . `Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 . Retrieved 26 April 2008 fromhttp /epw .senate .gov /PPA90 .pdfUS Supreme Court (2006 . `Massachusetts v . Environmental Protection Agency . CaseNo . 05-1120 , Court of Appeals , regularise of Columbia move . Retrieved 26 April2008 from http /www .supremecourtus .gov /opinions /06pdf /05-1120 .pdfEnvironmental Science and Policy foliate \ MERGEFORMAT 2 ...If you want to get a full essay, shape it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay